#Most profitable movie production companies movie
#Most profitable movie production companies series
#Most profitable movie production companies tv

#Most profitable movie production companies tv

Film Production Is Becoming More Sustainable and ProfitableĪccelerated by the pandemic, virtual production technologies are reducing and sometimes eliminating travel associated with film and TV productions. As for the data centers, on their own they account for over 2% of the global carbon emissions, and this is before the ‘Metaverse’ really takes off. And when using a 4G network, the emission amount to 4 gCO2e/hour.

#Most profitable movie production companies series

From the time we turn on a viewing device, to when the files move along optical fibers from data centers to deliver the streaming of a movie, carbon emissions are being released into the atmosphere.Ī recent study revealed that watching an hour series on 4K resolution using a fixed network emits approximately 30 gCO2e/hour. High-definition movies we watch on streaming apps are compressed and stored in power intensive and heat generating data centers which run 24/7. Disney’s Marvel Cinematic Universe may (deservedly) be the king of Hollywood, and Star Wars may (justifiably) rule in terms merchandise and spin-offs (since it originated as a movie), but Universal’s Jurassic Park/Jurassic World franchise is delivering results about as big, at least in theaters, for (sometimes much) less money.Additional post-production emissions must also be considered. In terms of bang for your buck and average rate of return, horror still rules, while even the tentpole world is ruled by two movies that are at least somewhat considered horror movies. That per-movie average is below The Avengers, Jurassic and Peter Jackson’s Middle Earth flicks ($5.85 billion over six movies) and above the Despicable movies and the Pirates of the Caribbean series ($4.5 billion/five movies equal $902 million each). The Star Wars movies grossed $10.225 billion over 11 movies on a combined budget of $1.667 billion for a rate of return of 6.133x and an average per-movie gross of $929 million. And during a time when Hollywood was obsessed with “cinematic universes,” you did not hear a word about Jurassic World 2 until Jurassic World was already a hit. Yes, the first and fourth installments overperformed, but none of them outright stumbled.

#Most profitable movie production companies movie

The franchise, kid-friendly and IMAX-appropriate, works as both IP and general “big action movie about dinosaurs on the loose” blockbuster entertainment, with only one-to-three actors who require a raise in between installments. Colin Trevorrow’s Jurassic World cost a perfectly reasonable $150 million (compared to $175 million for Dolittle) and still out-grossed the first Avengers ($1.519 billion in 2012). The Steven Spielberg-directed films’ budgets of $65 million and $75 million were considered “responsible” even back then.

And if Jurassic World: Dominion costs $200 million ( Jurassic World cost $150 million and Fallen Kingdom cost $170 million) and earns another $1.023 billion ( Jurassic World earned $1.671 billion in 2015 while Fallen Kingdom earned $1.308 billion in 2018), it’ll end its six-movie run (for now) with $6.032 billion on a combined budget of $816 million for a 7.3x rate-of-return, or just under The Twilight Saga.Ĭhalk it up to Jurassic Park and Lost World grossing $912 million and $619 million worldwide in 19 back when such a thing was not remotely the norm. So, ancillary revenue, inflation and marketing expenses notwithstanding, Jurassic remains the best bargain in modern Hollywood tentpole filmmaking. Even that rate of return, 6.01x, is below Jurassic’s, current average of 8.14x its respective budget.

For reference, the four Avengers films counted outside of the MCU have earned $7.757 million on a combined budget of $1.29 billion, for an average per-movie gross of $1.939 billion global.

That makes Jurassic the only “three movies or more” franchise to average $1 billion per movie.